I think it's great. I think it'll ease congestion and we'll be able to get out of town.
I remember reading that article and I thought all it's going to do is increase the traffic. The traffic is bad enough as it is. I personally would prefer to see them ... replace it with a new tunnel.
It might be an improvement to have a bridge but I'm sure that's going to be a huge, expensive undertaking. I guess it has its ups and downs.
I think we need a new bridge across there. The only worry I have is that it's connected to the coal port issue and that's the sole reason they're doing it.
I think it'll be terrific for shipping to the port. What changes will take effect either side of the bridge? In other words, the tunnel's a bottleneck only because we have nowhere for people to go after the tunnel.
