Editor:
We seem to be in an era where major decisions are made by just a few people with process that has little or no input from those who are affected. Many examples come to mind.
The latest is, of course, the smart meter fiasco. I have had an example of this personally.
Having received the warning letter informing the installation of a smart meter would be imminent, I arrived home to find a notice hanging on the door. This told me the contracted installer could not complete the job, as the existing meter was obstructed. A number to call was indicated.
I should explain that when purchasing this home 17 years ago I noted the electricity meter was protected by a box structure that was integrated into the house decor, although the meter was easily readable.
On telephoning the quoted number, which was the contracting installers' line, I was referred to B.C. Hydro, which informed me I must remove the boxed structure so installation can proceed.
I was left in no doubt this would be at my own expense, and that the installation of a smart meter was legally enforceable.
This state of affairs is lamentable, particularly in the setting that a new smart meter will in any event not be fully functional for a long time.
As an example of arbitrary governmental imposition, it can be matched to how the process is unfolding about Terminal 2 at Roberts Bank. Why doesn't Delta council emulate other municipalities in standing up for our interests?
The bureaucracy may have us down, but are we out?
Peter Duffey
